I don't disagree that the overall record is a logical tie-breaker and therefore Michigan should maybe be hosting the tournament. I mainly just don't think it's that big of a deal--I'd love a Big Ten Tournament Championship but we'll be in the playoffs and well-situated no matter what happens and that's what's really important (though there's no denying that winning the BT tournament would be helpful in getting a higher seed). If you're deciding the one team who gets the auto-bid into the NCAA tournament or something like that then you should make efforts to decide it less randomly; if you both do so well that you end the season by losing only two Big Ten games and all that is up for grabs is hosting the Big Ten tournament, I don't really have a problem that it's random.
The fact that we won a national championship is irrelevant in who should host this year's Big Ten tournament--this is a different team and a different year. If you want to use history, you could follow the football rules that use history and choose the team in the tie that has not hosted the tournament in the longest time, which would go to Northwestern.
Lastly, I have a hard time believing that Michigan was fighting for overall record as a tie-breaker and everybody got together to screw us. For one, I don't think anyone spent that much time coming up with the tie-break rules. For another if they happened to make the rules this year then, in the ESPN.com/USA softball preseason poll, Northwestern was ranked higher, so they probably would have been seen as more likely to benefit from overall record being a tie-breaker. In fact, at the beginning of the season, I think most people would have said Northwestern was getting screwed in Michigan's favor since anyone would have expected the two of us to be by far the best in the Big Ten and they had to play both games against us in Ann Arbor.
Mainly, yeah, Michigan is by most accounts a better team this year, so probably more deserving of hosting the tournament--but it's not that big of a deal and I'm certainly doubtful of any conspiracy theory around it.
<message edited by ZooWolverine on Sunday, May 04, 2008 11:15 PM>