|
1/19/2004 – Week #11 – The Empire Strikes Back
It
was a bad week for the University of Michigan men’s basketball
team. They only played one Big Ten game last week, and they lost.
They
lost to Michigan State (aka “The Evil Empire”) on Saturday
(01/17/2004) 71-54, in East Lansing. When I wrote about the
upcoming game last week, I predicted that MSU would win if Paul
Davis scored more than 20 points, and he did. He was the leading
scorer, with 22 points. He was the only Spartan in double figures.
He was also selected as the Big Ten Player of the Week this week.
The loss drops UM’s Big Ten record to 1-2, and their
overall record to 10-4. It also means that Michigan has lost 2
games in a row, and 3 out of the last 5. They need to get back on
the winning track, and quickly. Unfortunately, the next 7 games are
all tough, and things could get ugly. They play at
Wisconsin, at
Penn State, home vs.
Iowa, at
Illinois, home vs.
Purdue, at
Minnesota, and at Iowa, before they finally get a “break”, with
a home game vs. Penn State. They could easily lose all 7 of those
games, if they don’t start playing up to their potential.
The MSU game was very disappointing. It appears that
the teams are pretty evenly matched this year, but Michigan just
didn’t execute well. The Wolverines kept the game under control for
much of the first half, then they let it start slipping away in the
last 5 minutes of the half. MSU had a 9-point lead (32-23) at
halftime, and they managed to maintain that lead for most of the 2nd
half, and increased it at the end. The key point in the game came
about halfway through the 1st half, when UM stopped MSU
several times on defense, then threw the ball away on offense. They
were clinging to a 1-point lead, which they held for about 5
minutes, but they kept blowing opportunity after opportunity to
build on that lead. If they had taken advantage of the MSU scoring
drought, they could have built up a nice lead, and played their game
the rest of the way, instead of letting MSU have their way. Many of
the turnovers were a result of sloppy ball-handling and poor
passing, not due to MSU’s defense. They were mostly unforced
errors.
The stats from the game are very discouraging.
Michigan shot 8-for-24 (33%) in the 1st half, and
9-for-23 (39%) in the 2nd half, for an overall average of
36% (17-for-47). They had a good 1st half shooting
3-pointers (5-for-10), but they only shot 29% (2-for-7) in the 2nd
half, which works out to 41% (7-for-17) for the game. Even the
free-throw shooting was lousy: 40% (2-for-5) in the 1st
half, 69% (11-for-16) in the 2nd half, 62% (13-for-21)
overall. They got outrebounded (32-26), and they committed more
turnovers (22-18). It was not a good showing.
Only one Michigan
player had a good game against MSU;
Daniel Horton
scored 20 points, including 5-for-9 shooting from 3-point range.
However, he missed all 6 of his 2-point attempts, to end up
shooting 5-for-15, which is not so good.
Lester Abram almost hit double-figures, with 9 points, but the
rest of the starters did very poorly.
Bernard Robinson, Jr. had 5 points (on 2-for-8 shooting),
Courtney Sims had 4 points, and
Graham Brown had 3 points. The bench didn’t help out much
either:
J.C. Mathis had 6 points,
Dion Harris had 5, and
Chris Hunter had 2. They were the only bench players who got
in.
Brent Petway didn’t play, and
Sherrod Harrell is nursing a minor injury.
Losing to Michigan State is never fun, and this game
was no exception. It was great that UM finally beat MSU last year
in Ann Arbor, and I’ve enjoyed that victory for the last 12 months,
but it’s in the past now. I hadn’t expected Michigan to be able to
beat MSU in East Lansing, but I had hoped they’d play better than
they did. Looking at the two teams, I still can’t see any reason
why UM can’t beat MSU in Ann Arbor, on 2/24. The only bad omen is
that the game is being played while most of the students, including
the
Maize Rage, are away on Spring Break. Still, I believe that
Michigan can beat Michigan State in Crisler Arena next month.
As I mentioned above, the beat goes on for Michigan.
They have 2 games this week: at Wisconsin on Wednesday (01/21/2004),
and at Penn State on Saturday (01/24/2004). They stand a decent
chance of beating Penn State, but I’m afraid that the Wisconsin game
isn’t very promising. Wisconsin is the highest-ranked team in the
Big Ten (#18), and they beat MSU during the first week of the
season, in Madison, 77-64. They’re tall, they’re deep, they’re
experienced, and they’re very tough at home.
Let’s take a quick look at the current Big Ten
standings:
Teams
|
Big Ten
|
Overall
|
Wins
|
Losses
|
Percentage
|
Wins
|
Losses
|
Percentage
|
Wisconsin
|
2
|
1
|
0.667
|
11
|
3
|
0.786
|
Purdue
|
2
|
1
|
0.667
|
12
|
4
|
0.750
|
Indiana
|
2
|
1
|
0.667
|
8
|
6
|
0.571
|
Penn State
|
2
|
1
|
0.667
|
8
|
6
|
0.571
|
Michigan State
|
2
|
1
|
0.667
|
7
|
7
|
0.500
|
Illinois
|
2
|
2
|
0.500
|
11
|
4
|
0.733
|
Iowa
|
2
|
2
|
0.500
|
9
|
5
|
0.643
|
Northwestern
|
2
|
2
|
0.500
|
7
|
8
|
0.467
|
Michigan
|
1
|
2
|
0.333
|
10
|
4
|
0.714
|
Ohio State
|
1
|
2
|
0.333
|
9
|
7
|
0.563
|
Minnesota
|
0
|
3
|
0.000
|
8
|
7
|
0.533
|
There are already a few surprises, after just 2
weeks:
·
I didn’t expect Penn State to win more than 3 games
total, and they’re tied for 1st in the league at 2-1. Of
course, both of their wins have been at home, against the
bottom-feeders of the Big Ten (Ohio State and Minnesota), but still…
·
I didn’t expect
Indiana to do very well in Big Ten play, but they’re also tied
for 1st, and they beat Michigan in Ann Arbor.
·
I only expected
Northwestern to win 1 game in the Big Ten, yet they’ve already
won 2 games. They’re tied for 5th place with Illinois
and Iowa, they beat Iowa on the road, and they beat #25 Illinois in
Evanston. That’s the biggest surprise so far in the Big Ten.
·
I expected Minnesota to do much better than they have
so far. They lost at Penn State, which is kind of surprising, and
they lost at
Ohio State, which isn’t too bad, but they lost at home to Iowa,
which is a big shock. Minnesota just doesn’t lose many home games,
with that funky old gym and that weird floor of their’s.
Now, let’s look at Michigan’s remaining schedule, and
my predictions:
Date
|
Opponent
|
Site
|
Prediction
|
Record
|
Big Ten
|
Overall
|
Wed., Jan. 21
|
Wisconsin
|
Madison, Wis.
|
L
|
1-3
|
10-5
|
Sat., Jan. 24
|
Penn State
|
State College, Pa.
|
W
|
2-3
|
11-5
|
Wed., Jan. 28
|
Iowa
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
3-3
|
12-5
|
Sat., Jan. 31
|
Illinois
|
Champaign, Ill.
|
L
|
3-4
|
12-6
|
Sat., Feb. 7
|
Purdue
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
4-4
|
13-6
|
Wed., Feb. 11
|
Minnesota
|
Minneapolis, Minn.
|
L
|
4-5
|
13-7
|
Sat., Feb. 14
|
Iowa
|
Iowa City, Iowa
|
W
|
5-5
|
14-7
|
Wed., Feb. 18
|
Penn State
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
6-5
|
15-7
|
Sun., Feb. 22
|
Wisconsin
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
7-5
|
16-7
|
Tue., Feb. 24
|
Michigan State
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
8-5
|
17-7
|
Sun., Feb. 29
|
Ohio State
|
Ann Arbor
|
W
|
9-5
|
18-7
|
Mar. 2-3
|
Indiana
|
Bloomington, Ind.
|
L
|
9-6
|
18-8
|
Mar. 6-7
|
Northwestern
|
Evanston, Ill.
|
W
|
10-6
|
19-8
|
Michigan isn’t out of the Big Ten race, but they need
to win at least 5 of their next 7 games to stay in it. The game at
Wisconsin looks like a sure loss, and the game at Illinois looks
just as tough, so that means that they need to win the others,
including the game this Saturday at Penn State. If they can win 5
out of the next 7, they’ll be at 6-4, which should be good enough
for 3rd or 4th place. The key game is on
2/11, at Minnesota. If they can win that one, they’ll be in much
better shape in the Big Ten race.
Check back again next week to see how Michigan did,
and why.
Go Blue!
Drew
Montag
UMGoBlue.COM Basketball Editor
dmontag@umgoblue.com
|

Drew Montag is the Basketball Editor for the
UMGoBlue.COM. Drew graduated from the University of Michigan in 1978
and has both football and basketball season tickets.
Full Bio
Read More of Drew's Columns
|